Section 24G Rectification — guide

    What is a section 24G rectification application?

    A section 24G rectification application is the process under section 24G of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 that allows a person who started a listed activity without environmental authorisation to apply retrospectively, subject to an administrative fine of up to R10 million. It does not remove liability for any harm already caused.

    Section 24G and why it exists

    Section 24G of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998 was introduced to give a regulatory route to landowners and developers who commenced a listed activity, or continued one, without the environmental authorisation required under section 24. It is not an amnesty. It is a formal application that can be refused, and refusal leaves the underlying contravention unresolved.

    Commencing a listed activity without authorisation is also a criminal offence under section 24F of NEMA, carrying its own separate penalties. A section 24G application addresses the administrative consequence, not the criminal one, and the two can run in parallel.

    The administrative fine

    Section 24G(3) allows the competent authority to impose an administrative fine of up to R10 million, calculated with reference to factors such as the severity of environmental harm, whether the applicant benefited financially from the contravention, and the extent of cooperation shown. The fine is separate from the compliance costs of remediation the authority may also require.

    In practice the fine is rarely the statutory maximum for smaller developments, but it is assessed on the facts of each matter, and authorities have become markedly less lenient since roughly 2020. A poorly prepared application, or one that understates the contravention, tends to attract a higher fine and closer scrutiny than a properly disclosed one.

    Directive risk before you apply

    Before or instead of a section 24G application, the department can issue a compliance notice or directive under section 28 or section 31L of NEMA requiring work to stop and requiring rehabilitation. Where a directive has already been issued, the rectification application must be dealt with alongside compliance with that directive, not as a substitute for it.

    Ignoring a directive while a section 24G application is pending is a further offence. The correct sequence is to respond to any directive, commission the required environmental assessment, and lodge the rectification application concurrently.

    What the rectification application must contain

    A section 24G application must include a full description of the contravention, an environmental impact assessment equivalent in scope to what would have been required had authorisation been sought before commencement, a public participation process, and a compliance statement addressing the fine factors listed in the Regulations.

    Because the assessment is done retrospectively, specialist reports often need to assess actual impacts rather than predicted ones, which can require additional site investigation, historical aerial imagery and monitoring data not needed in a standard application.

    Timelines

    A straightforward section 24G application, where the contravention is limited and no directive dispute is outstanding, typically takes four to eight months from instruction to a decision. More complex matters involving multiple listed activities, sensitive receiving environments or an active directive can take twelve months or longer.

    Thresholds and indicative fees

    Section 24G exposure and timelines by scenario
    ScenarioLegal basisFine exposureTimelineIndicative fixed fee
    Single listed activity, limited impacts24G, NEMA 107 of 1998Low to moderate portion of R10m cap4 – 8 monthsR60,000 – R120,000
    Multiple listed activities on one sites24G, NEMAModerate to high8 – 14 monthsR120,000 – R220,000
    Active directive under s28 or s31Ls24G read with s28/31L, NEMAHigh10 – 18 monthsR150,000 – R280,000
    Sensitive environment (wetland, coastal)s24G, NEMAHigh12 – 20 monthsR180,000 – R320,000
    Criminal referral under s24F alongside 24Gs24F and s24G, NEMAFine plus criminal exposureCase dependentQuoted on facts

    How the process runs

    1. 1Exposure assessmentWe review the contravention, any directive received, and estimate your realistic fine exposure and timeline.
    2. 2Directive responseWhere a directive has been issued, we respond formally and align it with the rectification process.
    3. 3Retrospective environmental assessmentSpecialists assess actual site impacts and prepare the assessment report to the standard required by the Regulations.
    4. 4Public participationWe run the required notification and comment process with interested and affected parties.
    5. 5Compliance statement and lodgementWe compile the compliance statement addressing the statutory fine factors and lodge the application.
    6. 6Fine negotiation and decisionWe engage the authority on the proposed fine before the final decision is issued.

    Continue reading

    Last reviewed: 2026-09-17

    Written and reviewed by Dynamic Legal Services (Pty) Ltd, registration 2016/074955/07. Registered with the Department of Water and Sanitation, EAPASA applicant. Offices in Faerie Glen, Pretoria and Sandown, Sandton. Telephone 087 153 6207, support@dlegal.co.za. General information on South African regulatory practice, not advice on a specific matter — the first consultation is free.